Current:Home > MarketsCalifornia voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls--DB Wealth Institute B2 Reviews Insights
California voters lose a shot at checking state and local tax hikes at the polls
View Date:2025-01-19 21:04:56
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — The California Supreme Court on Thursday removed a measure from the November ballot that would have made it harder to raise taxes, siding with Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature.
The measure would have required voter approval for tax increases passed by the state Legislature. It also would have raised the threshold required for voter approval of certain local government tax increases to a two-thirds vote at the polls. Currently those tax increases can take affect if a simple majority of voters approve.
The measure would have applied retroactively to most tax increases approved since Jan. 1, 2022. Local governments warned that would mean they could have lost billions of dollars in revenue that had previously been approved by voters.
Newsom has opposed many tax increases during his time in office. But he sued to block this measure, saying it would harm local governments and take away the Legislature’s ability to raise taxes.
Supporters of the ballot measure argued that California has become too expensive and voters need more control over taxes. In a unanimous decision, the court ruled the measure could not be enacted by ballot initiative because it “would substantially alter our basic plan of government.” Justice Goodwin Liu wrote the opinion. “The Supreme Court’s decision to take this dangerous initiative off the ballot avoids a host of catastrophic impacts, protecting billions of dollars for schools, access to reproductive health care, gun safety laws that keep students safe in classrooms, and paid family leave,” said Jonathan Underland, spokesperson for the campaign that opposed the initiative. Removing a qualified measure from the ballot before an election is rare in California, but not unprecedented. The court wrote it was necessary in this case to review the initiative because it would have potentially voided tax increases put in place after Jan. 1, 2022. That may have deprived government of some funding lawmakers were counting on.
veryGood! (193)
Related
- Volunteer firefighter accused of setting brush fire on Long Island
- Arkansas police chief accused of beating, stranding suspect in rural area, faces kidnapping charge
- What is wasabi and why does it have such a spicy kick?
- Did the groundhog see his shadow? See results of Punxsutawney Phil's 2024 winter forecast
- 12 college students charged with hate crimes after assault in Maryland
- Report: Feds investigating WWE founder Vince McMahon sex-trafficking allegations
- AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Nevada’s presidential primary and caucuses
- Around the world: Michigan man speeds across globe in quest to break Guinness record
- Texas’ 90,000 DACA recipients can sign up for Affordable Care Act coverage — for now
- A Trump-era tax law could get an overhaul. Millions could get a bigger tax refund this year as a result.
Ranking
- Advocates Expect Maryland to Drive Climate Action When Trump Returns to Washington
- Las Vegas Raiders 'expected' to hire Kliff Kingsbury as offensive coordinator, per reports
- A year on, a small Ohio town is recovering from a fiery train derailment but health fears persist
- President Joe Biden to attend dignified transfer for US troops killed in Jordan, who ‘risked it all’
- Duke basketball vs Kentucky live updates: Highlights, scores, updates from Champions Classic
- Selena Gomez Shares Intimate Glimpse Into Benny Blanco Romance With Bed Photo
- Did the Georgia groundhog see his shadow? General Beauregard Lee declares early spring
- As impeachment looms, Homeland Security secretary says his agency will not be distracted by politics
Recommendation
-
Monument erected in Tulsa for victims of 1921 Race Massacre
-
New California Senate leader says his priorities are climate change, homelessness and opioid crises
-
This week on Sunday Morning (February 4)
-
How do you guard Iowa's Caitlin Clark? 'Doesn’t matter what you do – you’re wrong'
-
Volunteer firefighter accused of setting brush fire on Long Island
-
Towering over the Grammys is a Los Angeles high-rise tagged with 27 stories of graffiti
-
A big idea for small farms: How to link agriculture, nutrition and public health
-
Carl Weathers, actor who starred in Rocky and Predator, dies at age 76